Mr. Golanski is a regular speaker at professional and judicial conferences throughout the nation.  He has published numerous articles and essays, particularly in the areas of products liability, toxic torts, and legal theory.  These include:

• “Argument and the ‘Moral Impact’ Theory of Law, 11 Washington University Jurisprudence Review 293-343 (2019);
• “Why Daimler Accommodates Personal Jurisdiction in Mass Tort Litigations” 80 Albany Law Review 101 (2017);
• ”Nonmoral Theoretical Disagreement in Law,” 42 Mitchell Hamline Law Review 225-272 (2016) ;
• Book Chapter:  “Legal Considerations of Forensic Applications of Epidemiology in the United States,” in FORENSIC EPIDEMIOLOGY:  PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE (Michael Freeman & Maurice Zeegers eds., Elsevier, 2016);
• (with Kristal, J.), ”A Reply to James K. Toohey and Rebecca L. Matthews’ Commentary: ‘Liability for the Post-Sale Installation of Asbestos-Containing Replacement Parts or Installation.’” Mealey’s Litigation Report: Asbestos (2011);
• ”Legal Theory From the Regulative Point of View,” 44 Cumberland Law Review 1-53 (2014), revised;
• “A New Look at Duty in Tort Law: Rehabilitating Foreseeability, and Related Themes,” 75 Albany Law Review 227 (2011/2012) (cited in Wilson v. Moore Freightservice, Inc., No. 4:14-CV-00771, 2015 WL 1345261 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2015); Carney v. Galt, No. 2014-CA-001124-MR, 2017 WL 383451 (Ky. Ct. App., Jan. 27, 2017; Grubb v. Smith, 2017 WL 1102860 (Ky. Mar. 23, 2017));
• ”Paradigm Shifts in Products Liability and Negligence,” 71 U. Pittsburgh Law Review 673 (2010);
• ”General Causation at the Crossroads in Toxic Tort Cases,” 108 Penn State Law Review 479 (2003) (discussed in CARL F. CRANOR, TOXIC TORTS: SCIENCE, LAW, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF JUSTICE (Cambridge Univ. Press 2006), and cited, inter alia, in the Harvard Environmental Law Review, Issue 30 (2006));
• ”Linguistics in Law,” 66 Albany Law Review 61 (2002) (discussed in CHRISTOPHER HUTTON, LANGUAGE, MEANING AND THE LAW (Edinburgh Univ. Press 2009));
• ”When Sellers of ‘Safe’ Products Turn Ostrich in Relation to Dangerous Post-Sale Components,” 39 Southwestern University Law Review 69 (2009);
• ”Why Legal Scholars Get Daubert Wrong–A Contextualist Explanation of Law’s Epistemology,” 22 Whittier Law Review 653-721 (2001) (relied upon in SAMIR COPRA & LAURENCE F. WHITE, A LEGAL THEORY FOR AUTONOMOUS ARTIFICIAL AGENTS (University of Michigan Press 2011);
• ”Kahn’s Reign and Its Metaphors for Law–A Critique in the Philosophy of Legal Culture,” 27 Southwestern University Law Review 89 (2000).

• Book Chapter, ”Why There is Widespread Nonmoral Theoretical Disagreement in Law,” in SELECTED ISSUES IN MODERN JURISPRUDENCE (David A. Frenkel ed., 2016).

Mr. Golanski has also authored numerous book reviews, including (with Comerford, T.) ”The Speculation Economy: How Finance Triumphed Over Industry” (Lawrence E. Mitchell), New York Law Journal (Feb. 17, 2009), ”The Common Law Tradition: A Collective Portrait of Five Legal Scholars” (George W. Liebmann), New York Law Journal (Oct. 26, 2006), ”David Hackett Souter: Traditional Republican on the Rehnquist Court” (Tinsley E. Yarbrough), New York Law Journal (November 17, 2005), ”Rights From Wrongs: A Secular Theory of the Origins of Rights” (Alan Dershowitz), New York Law Journal (February 16, 2005), ”The Song Sparrow and the Child: Claims of Science and Humanity” (Joseph Vining), New York Law Journal (July 20, 2004), ”The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial Activism” (Paul O. Carrese), New York Law Journal (August 26, 2003), and ”Justice at Dachau: The Trials of an American Prosecutor” (Joshua M. Greene), New York Law Journal (July 25, 2003).